"Nothing has ever been preserved – at best, it is being preserved."
--Ray Edmundson, UNESCO's Audiovisual Archiving: Philosophy and Principles, 2004.You probably heard about the fire that broke out at Universal Studios at the end of last month. You may have heard that several firefighters suffered "minor injuries" while extinguishing the blaze, but otherwise no-one was hurt, thankfully. You may also have heard the initial reports that the fire destroyed a video libary. You may have breathed a sigh of relief when learning that it was not an archive containing the only copies of the materials in Universal's film library.
Indeed, it appears that the negatives of Universal's film holdings are safe, stored in a location far from the site of the conflagration. Presumably in a vault better protected from the possibility of fire damage coming from a source outside the building. Unfortunately, a great many archival film prints, including a sizable proportion of those prints sent by the studio to repertory theatres, cinematheques and film festivals all over the world for public exhibition, were consumed in the fire. They may have been "duplicates" of the original negatives, but that doesn't mean they won't be missed.
Film preservation does not begin and end with the safeguarding of original materials. It's part of a cycle that includes the presentation of films to the public, preferably in a manner as close as possible to that which filmmakers intended their work to be seen. At the beginning of this article I quoted a document considered to be something of a mission statement for film archivists. Here's another pertinent quote from that document:
Preservation is necessary to ensure permanent accessibility; yet preservation is not an end in itself. Without the objective of access it has no point.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d0023/d0023d24892daa34be0fa12595d3ac14f1296be3" alt=""
For the time being, I'm optimistically hoping that Meyer's quote is not a belittling of the damage to the audience's connection to our collective aesthetic and cultural history, but an indication of intention to restore the damage and make the destroyed films available for circulation as soon as possible. It's possible for Universal to strike new 35mm prints of lost titles, at what the New York Times is reporting as approximately $5,000 a pop. The question is, how much effort in this direction will be made in 2008, as the number of 35mm film projectors in commercial operation around the world is starting to decline? As Lincoln Spector has succintly put it, "economic realities control what does and does not get replaced."
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/18700/1870094fa38796e31ba1cc3732ef49565c0168e2" alt=""
Other Frisco venues are affected as well. Michael Guillén, while reporting the 35mm prints to be shown at the Frameline festival that opens at the Castro this Thursday, noted that the Wachowskis' lesbian thriller Bound, scheduled as part of a tribute to departing programmer Michael Lumpkin, was among the titles affected by the fire, and may indeed be projected digitally at the Castro next Tuesday if a new print is not able to be struck in time.
Luckily, other previously-announced Castro bookings are not affected. The Silent Film Festival presentation of the Man Who Laughs, which in 1928 was Universal's attempt to recreate the gothic horror success of the Phantom of the Opera and the Hunchback of Notre Dame, is safe. As the festival's artistic director Stephen Salmons notes near the beginning of a recent podcast interview, a beautiful print is held by the Library of Congress and is the one that will play July 12th. The print of Jaws set to play the Castro July 19th was not harmed. I'm told that nothing on the current or upcoming Pacific Film Archive calendar was affected by the fire, either.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/acdad/acdad97086ffb1cefcaa4c8645824f4e8e595495" alt=""
Striking new 35mm prints can be costly, but so can be screening from non-studio prints. As I understand it, even when a venue is able to locate an alternate source to project from, whether a DVD or a collector's print, it's required to pay the rightsholder for the privilege of showing their intellectual property, on top of whatever fees a collector may charge for the loan of their alternate print. As a result, I have a feeling that many programmers around the country are going to shy away from placing fire-affected Universal titles on upcoming schedules, when possible. Unless, of course, the studio itself agrees to front the cost of replacing their prints. Again, we can hope.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/47dd9/47dd98e8a6fb36af7a49eb192d26cb74852e7f13" alt=""
I don't know if the print of Make Way For Tomorrow I saw Saturday night came from Universal (I think I remember a MOMA title at the beginning) - but I know that 2-3 of the films in the Harvard Film Archive's Leo McCarey series came from them, and thus were safe because of it - Ruggles of Red Gap definitely - at least one other print, either Going My Way or Make Way for Tomorrow - was definitely theirs... Otherwise - the comments at the shows reflect what you say: that circulating prints were lost, not archive prints; that quite a few titles were in fact in circulation at the time; plus some suggestion that fewer prints were lost than had been thought - I hope that wasn't just wishful thinking...
ReplyDeleteThat's very relieving news, weepingsam! I also learned since posting this that Taking Off is supposed to play at New York's MOMA this week, and with no indication of anything different on the website, I'm optimistic that a 35mm print exists of that title, too.
ReplyDeleteThis post seems to indicate that the Scarlet Empress, a Countess From Hong Kong and Privilege were lost to the fire, but again, it could be that they're simply temporarily misplaced. I'm crossing my fingers that the impact of this fire is not as severe as feared.
CHARADE is a PD film. Perhaps they screened a 'no charge' 16mm print or even a DVD?
ReplyDeleteGood suggestions, Royce. My source called it a "print" and is definitely knowledgeable enough to recognize the difference between a film and DVD projection. It's possible it was 16mm; I know the Stanford has shown lapsed-copyright films in 16mm in the past (I saw a 16mm print of the Sin of Harold Diddlebock there several years back). Perhaps that's the situation this time as well.
ReplyDeleteThank you for this very interesting summary of the fire and consequent impact on revival screenings. Here's hoping Universal will replace the lost inventory with new prints, though I have my doubts they will.
ReplyDeleteThanks for stopping by, John. And for the reminder to visit your own blog, which I had not visited in a while. Your Jimmy **ahem** I mean James Stewart centennial piece comes just at the right time, after last week's Anthony Mann twofer and the screening of the Man Who Shot Liberty Valance I attended in San Rafael last night. And your Warner Brothers cartoon appreciation and the resulting comments section are incredibly informative.
ReplyDeleteYour kind comments much appreciated, Brian. How I envy you living amongst all those fantastic festivals and revivals! Just added your link at my site --- hope that's OK. You've got a handsome page here, and I learn lots every time I stop in.
ReplyDeleteOf course! One of these days I'm going to reconstruct my own links section; the only reason I haven't before now is that it turns out to be much more laborious in "New" blogger than it was in the old version, at least for someone with my limited html skills.
ReplyDeleteHere is a link to another article that talks about fallout from the fire.
I can confirm that Harvard Film Archive showed a 35mm print of "Make Way for Tomorrow". It had been en route from another venue, and/or from the vault, when the fire took place.
ReplyDeleteThanks for stopping by with the heartening confirmation! Love your blog, too. Day of the Outlaw and Quick Billy, the subjects of your last two posts, are high on my list of favorite films.
ReplyDeleteSwank is listed as the print source for BOUND.
ReplyDeleteLarge the subscribers be counted you've got, maximum famous you're. To get one thousand Free subscribers SignUp at ytbpals.Com and totally free YouTube subscribers and learn about fixes of pii errors of outlook om [pii_email_37f47c404649338129d6] check here now
ReplyDelete